Food for Thought Dinners
Have dinner with your favorite bloggers, and discuss the important issues of the day.
BlogNashville: The Grand Ole Blogpry
Labels: blogger
BUILD TRADE, NOT WALLS.
Web 2.0, Social Networking & the New Golden Rolodex
Labels: blogger
Labels: Internet
Labels: business blog, marketing, tools
Labels: Charlotte
Labels: software
Labels: SEO
Labels: blogger
Labels: Web 2.0
Labels: business blog, Charlotte, marketing
Labels: marketing
Labels: business blog, politics, tips
Labels: blogger, business blog, Charlotte, Internet
Labels: business blog
Labels: Charlotte
Labels: business blog
Labels: business blog, marketing, SEO, syndication
Labels: marketing, ogilvy, politics, Time Management, tools
Labels: business blog, marketing, politics, software
Labels: business blog, CEO, marketing, SEO
Labels: advertising, blogger
Labels: Charlotte
Labels: access, advertising, software, tools
Labels: advertising, business blog, marketing
Labels: tools
Labels: blogger
Labels: Podcasting
The Learning Organization Litmus Test
How do you know if your company is a learning organization? These simple litmus tests can help determine whether or not your company qualifies:
Does the organization have a defined learning agenda?
Learning organizations have a clear picture of their future knowledge requirements. They know what they need to know, whether the subject is customers, competitors, markets, technologies, or production processes, and are actively pursuing the desired information. Even in industries that are changing as rapidly as telecommunications, computers, and financial services, broad areas of needed learning can usually be mapped with some precision. Once they have been identified, these topics are pursued through multiple approaches, including experiments, simulations, research studies, post-audits, and benchmarking visits, rather than education and training alone.
Is the organization open to discordant information?
If an organization regularly "shoots the messenger" who brings forward unexpected or bad news, the environment is clearly hostile to learning. Behavior change is extremely difficult in such settings, for there are few challenges to the status quo. Sensitive topics — dissension in the ranks, unhappy customers, preemptive moves by competitors, problems with new technologies — are considered to be off limits, and messages are filtered, massaged, and watered down as they make their way up the chain of command.
Does the organization avoid repeated mistakes?
Learning organizations reflect on past experience, distill it into useful lessons, share the knowledge internally, and ensure that errors are
not repeated elsewhere. Databases, intranets, training sessions, and workshops can all be used for this purpose. Even more critical, however, is a mind-set that enables companies to recognize the value of productive failure as contrasted with unproductive success. A productive failure leads to insights, understanding, and thus an addition to commonly held wisdom of the organization.
And unproductive success occurs when something goes well, but nobody knows how or why. There is a peculiar logic at work here: to avoid repeating mistakes, managers must learn to accept them the first time around.
Does the organization lose critical knowledge when key people leave?
The story is all too common: a talented employee leaves the company, and critical skills disappear as well. Why? Because crucial knowledge was tacit, unarticulated, and unshared, locked in the head of a single person. Learning organizations avoid this problem by institutionalizing essential knowledge. Whenever possible, they codify it in policies or procedures, retain it in reports or memos, disperse it to large groups of people, and build it into the company's values, norms, and operating practices. Knowledge becomes common property, rather than the province of individuals or small groups.
Does the organization act on what it knows?
Learning organizations are not simply repositories of knowledge.
They take advantage of their new learning and adapt their behavior accordingly. Information is to be used; if it languishes or is ignored, its impact is certain to be minimal. By this test, an organization that discovers an unmet market need but fails to fill it does not qualify as a learning organization, nor does a company that identifies its own best practices but is unable to transfer them across departments or divisions.
From Chapter 1 of Learning in Action
This Internet stuff has gotten out of hand, and just because widely available, simple-to-use technology makes it possible to share your goofy opinions with billions of people doesn't mean you should.
Blogs -- Web logs -- are sources of rumor, innuendo and downright lies, and there's no control over what goes into one. Doofs too naive to discern ravings from reportage cite them as if they were factual. There are enough misinformed people already, thank you.
Blogs are also a lot of work. Oh sure, it sounds fun, ragging on Ryan Seacrest one day and posting your plan for Mideast peace the next. But then you realize that if you don't keep updating the blog, the pack of dimwits hanging on your every word will dwindle.
I really do wish the Observer would at least try to keep up. Create a Future section, and pretend blogging is still in the future. There are bloggers at the Observer. Let them show the rest of of the folks how and why it is done. Or ask the folks at the Greensboro News and Record. Now that is an advanced news source!
When Charlotte plays host to the Blogger Conference in a few short months, will the Observer send representatives, like they did in Greensboro? There are some bright folks up in those hallowed glassed in boxes. When will they carpe the diem? A simple perusal of this very blog should be proof enough that blogging is an important and essential untapped resource...for business as well as many other sectors of society, religion included.
WFAE radio is soon to be podcasting, and probably blogging. Glad there is some leadership in our media midst.
Labels: blogger, business blog, Charlotte, Internet, Podcasting, visionaries, visionary
Labels: blogger, business blog, Charlotte, marketing, Podcasting, Rubel
Labels: aggregator, blogger, business blog, Internet, marketing, politics, RSS Feed, SEO, syndication, tools, Web 2.0
Labels: software
Labels: blogger
Labels: syndication, tools
Labels: Charlotte, Podcasting, Rubel
Labels: tools
Labels: aggregator, bloggercon, Internet, Podcasting, wiki
Labels: advertising, Internet, marketing
Labels: Podcasting
Labels: marketing
Labels: blog consulting, Idea Consultant, Idea Consulting
Labels: Charlotte, Internet, Podcasting, politics
EXCERPTS:
Greensboro101.com is a central Web page that uses sophisticated software to produce an up-to-the-minute listing of what's going on with Greensboro's blogs.
The site is open to anybody who wants to read it, but its special feature is that bloggers can link their blogs directly to the site. Then, as they update their sites with news or comments, Greensboro101.com automatically presents a rolling list of topics from all the blogs for that hour. All the readers do is click what they want to read.
The software does the work. "I've described it as democratic and agnostic," Smith said, meaning he doesn't cast his opinions into the mix.
Smith isn't the only person to operate such a site. But he plans to make it stand out with creative software and the involvement of local people. He has also appointed an advisory board of local people for the site and holds regular meetings.
For Smith, 42, it's all an effort to keep the Internet very local and very accessible.
Last week, Smith launched Charlotte101.us and Nashville101.com. If those sites catch on, Smith is ready to go to any city where there's a market. The key, said his friend, journalist Ed Cone, will be to find local people in those cities who can work for the sites to keep them uniquely local.
Smith's product is the rough equivalent of an alternative newspaper -- that's published continuously instead of weekly.
Labels: Web 2.0
Labels: Internet
Labels: advertising, audioblog, business blog, Internet, Podcasting, syndication
Labels: politics
Labels: advertising, blogger, Charlotte, parker